<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog for Peace and Freedom &#187; constitutional law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=constitutional-law" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:56:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>U.S. Judge slaps down Obama&#8217;s warrantless seizures</title>
		<link>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=3162</link>
		<comments>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=3162#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Crockford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=3162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From an article on the CNET website&#8230;
A federal judge has ruled that border agents cannot seize a traveler&#8217;s laptop, keep in locked up for months, and examine it for contraband files without a warrant half a year later.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White in the Northern District of California rejected the Obama administration&#8217;s argument that no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3162</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hypocrisy of Corporate Personhood</title>
		<link>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=1785</link>
		<comments>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=1785#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Crockford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=1785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On his personal blog, Michael Perelman writes:
In light of the Supreme Court’s outrageous decision about campaign finance, I would suggest a move to treat corporations as persons — making them liable to imprisonment and even the death penalty, when they cause loss of life.

To read the complete article, go to http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com/2010/01/23/the-hypocrisy-of-corporate-personhood/.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1785</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Healthcare Reform: Unconstitutional?</title>
		<link>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=1576</link>
		<comments>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=1576#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>typist22</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=1576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sheldon H. Laskin, in an article on CounterCurrents.org, questions whether Congress has the constitutional authority to require Americans to purchase a commodity from a private, for-profit corporation.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1576</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Warrantless Wiretapping Case, Obama DOJ&#8217;s New Arguments Are Worse Than Bush&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=742</link>
		<comments>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=742#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Crockford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiretapping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Again, the gulf between Candidate Obama and President Obama is striking. As a candidate, Obama ran promising a new era of government transparency and accountability, an end to the Bush DOJ&#8217;s radical theories of executive power, and reform of the PATRIOT Act. But, this week, Obama&#8217;s own Department Of Justice has argued that, under the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=742</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hard Cases Make Bad Law</title>
		<link>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=346</link>
		<comments>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=346#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bobevans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initiative process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposition 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Hard cases make bad law&#8221; is a long-standing expression for the concept that if appellate courts (which indeed do make law, regardless of the myth that the courts merely &#8220;interpret&#8221; law) have to struggle to reach a just result in a particular case, and are forced to twist and turn existing legal precedent to do [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peaceandfreedom.org/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=346</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
