Where to Invade Next (North End Productions, 2015), written and directed by Michael Moore.
Reviewed by Roger D. Harris
Posted on February 23 by the Communications Committee
The title Where to Invade Next pimps off of the idea of critiquing US imperialism’s war without end. But documentarian Michael Moore is not going there in his first film in six years.
With Old Glory in tow, Moore’s “one-man army…invades” Western Europe, plus stops in Slovenia and Tunisia, to “steal” good eye-opening ideas to take home:
- Gourmet public school lunches in France.
- Free higher education for citizens and foreigners alike in Slovenia.
- Decriminalization of drugs and attendant social services in Portugal.
- Schools emphasizing time to socialize over teaching to the test in Finland.
- Two-hour lunch breaks and eight-weeks of vacation plus paid maternity leave in Italy.
- Public education condemning its fascist past in Germany, compared to the amnesia in the US regarding the genocide of our indigenous and the enslavement of Africans.
- Prisons for humane rehabilitation in Denmark.
Spoiler alert, each and every country “surrenders” and even points out that some of their “secrets” originated in the US, such as the May 1st celebration of working people.
Trumbo (distributed by Bleeker Street Media, 2015), screenplay by John McNamara, directed by Danny Boyle.
Reviewed by Roger D. Harris
Posted on January 5, 2016 by the Communications Committee
Trumbo, a Hollywood movie with big name actors and cutting edge production values, portrays communists and by extension their principles in a sympathetic light. Further, Democrats come off in the movie as cowards and quislings, while Republicans are mean-spirited corrupt bullies. Besides being historically accurate, Trumbo is a thoroughly engrossing entertainment experience with drama, intelligent dialogue, and flashes of humor. All that and without gratuitous sex and violence.
Little wonder then that the mainstream media have been less than enthusiastic about a depiction of American history that is critical of their corporate sponsors. The New York Times dismisses the film as hagiography.
Cloud Atlas (Warner Brothers, 2012). Written and directed by Tom Tykwer, Andy Wachowski and Lana Wachowski. Based on the novel by David Mitchell.
Reviewed by Cat Woods
Posted November 2, 2012 by the Communications Committee
Spoiler Alert: because it contains plot details, you may want to read this review after seeing the film.
Cloud Atlas should change the world.
Not that I necessarily expect it to, but it really ought to. Just as I have said for decades that Ursula Le Guin’s The Dispossessed (1974) should have changed the world. Had the world responded appropriately to that book, our lives would be different. By all rights, it should have instigated study groups around the globe to consider the myriad interwoven issues it explored regarding the tensions between individual freedom, ethics, and the role of a fair or unfair social order. We should have spent recent decades not necessarily agreeing with Le Guin’s anarchist model of a socialist society but debating our various answers to the critical questions she raised. By rights, The Dispossessed should have launched a whole genre of socio-political literature exploring the nature of socialist vision and the various possible mechanisms of its enactment. Yet 38 years later, it still stands alone; and it has yet to be made into a movie. Even if Hollywood did take its hand to it, you can bet they’d keep the bare-breasted bourgeois women, the chase scenes, and the violent suppression of a popular demonstration while losing every important message about what a better, more just arrangement of the world might look like, how socialism might be won, and what a more equitable social order means personally for the people who participate in it.